Comparison of effect on psychomotor performance of single doses of propranolol and acebutolol
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Informa Healthcare in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 7 (1) , 33-37
- https://doi.org/10.1185/03007998009116512
Abstract
Propranolol has recently been shown to produce some impairment of psychomotor performance in human volunteers. This beta-blocking compound, however, is lipophilic and readily penetrates the blood-brain barrier to gain access to the central nervous system. Acebutolol has a lower lipid solubility. A study was carried out, therefore, to compare the psychomotor effect of the two beta-blocking drugs. Any subjectively experienced side-effects were also recorded. Ten healthy volunteers were given single doses of 40 mg propranolol, 100 mg acebutolol and placebo on a random double-blind basis and the effect, if any, on performance was measured using a particularly sensitive complex reaction time technique. Propranolol produced a significant prolongation of complex reaction time when compared with placebo or acebutolol. Acebutolol did not significantly increase complex reaction time over the placebo value. Two subjects reported mild feelings of 'muzziness' after taking propranolol. No side-effects were reported after acebutolol.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- CSF/plasma ratios of propranolol in man [proceedings]Published by Wiley ,1978
- The Central Uptake of β-Adrenoceptor AntagonistsJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1977
- Propranolol and skilled human performancePharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 1976
- A Clinical and Psychometric Evaluation of Flurazepam as a Hypnotic in Psychiatric PatientsCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 1975
- Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Blocking Drugs in PsychiatryArchives of General Psychiatry, 1974
- ??-Adrenergic Receptor Blocking Drugs in HypertensionDrugs, 1974
- Controlled Trial of Propranolol in HypertensionBMJ, 1970
- Use of Propranolol (Inderal) in Treatment of HypertensionBMJ, 1964