Comparative efficacy of different methods of nebulising terbutaline
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 25 (6) , 739-742
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00542512
Abstract
The efficacy of terbutaline inhaled from different aerosol systems was studied in 13 adult asthmatics. Terbutaline 1 mg was delivered from a pressurised aerosol, 1 and 4 mg were inhaled from a nebuliser, 1 mg was inhaled through a pressurised aerosol with a pear-shaped, 750 ml spacer, and 1 mg was inhaled from a nebuliser with Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (I.P.P.V.). An open, randomized, cross-over design was used. The bronchodilator effect was evaluated by recording hourly flow-volume curves and the FEV1.0 for 5 h after treatment. No significant difference in bronchodilatation was observed after inhalation of 1 mg terbutaline from different aerosol systems, except following use of the nebuliser, which required approximately four times as much terbutaline to obtain the same effect as the ordinary spray.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of a special inhaler attachment in asthmatic children.Thorax, 1980
- Effect of an extension tube on the bronchodilator efficacy of terbutaline delivered from a metered dose inhaler.Thorax, 1980
- A comparison of salbutamol given by pressure-packed aerosol or nebulization via IPPB in acute asthmaRespiratory Medicine, 1978
- Annals of allergy.1975
- Comparison of two methods of administering bronchodilator aerosol to asthmatic patients.BMJ, 1975
- A Critical Look at IPPBChest, 1974
- The Effect of a Nebulized Bronchodilator Administered with or without Intermittent Positive Pressure Breathing on Ventilatory Function in Children with Cystic Fibrosis and Asthma1,2American Review of Respiratory Disease, 1972
- MIST THERAPY RECONSIDERED; AN EVALUATION OF THE RESPIRATORY DEPOSITION OF LABELLED WATER AEROSOLS PRODUCED BY JET AND ULTRASONIC NEBULIZERSPediatrics, 1969