Restructuring the British Welfare State: Between Domestic Constraints and Global Imperatives
- 7 September 2000
- book chapter
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP)
Abstract
In the UK, as in Australia and New Zealand, the ‘liberal’ post‐war welfare state was conceived as a minimal safety net under conditions in which full employment was to be ensured by (‘Keynesian’) macroeconomic policies. In the 1950s and 1960s, economic growth was constrained by stop–go policies trying to defend the pound as an international reserve currency in the face of inflationary wage pressures. After the dramatic failure of Labour economic policies in the crises of the 1970s, the (‘monetarist’) Conservative government of the 1980s succeeded in breaking the power of the unions and in stabilizing the currency at the expense of full employment, but did not fundamentally change the structure of the welfare state. After 1997, however, the ‘New Labour’ government set out to adjust the liberal welfare state to conditions in which government economic policies could no longer ensure full employment.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- "Work for those that can, security for those that cannot":The United Kingdom's new social security reform agendaInternational Social Security Review, 1999
- Labour costs and employment policyNational Institute Economic Review, 1998
- Why so Austere? The British Welfare State of the 1940sJournal of Social Policy, 1998
- What Do Comparisons Of The Last Two Economic Recoveries Tell Us About The UK Labour Market?National Institute Economic Review, 1996
- The assessment: inequalityOxford Review of Economic Policy, 1996
- Creating the Welfare State in Britain, 1945–1960Journal of Social Policy, 1996
- Closing The UK Competitiveness GapNational Institute Economic Review, 1995
- SOCIAL SECURITY POLICY IN A CHANGING LABOUR MARKETOxford Review of Economic Policy, 1995
- Welfare and the EconomyTwentieth Century British History, 1995
- A Flexible Future in Europe?: Changing Patterns of Employment in the United KingdomBritish Journal of Sociology, 1990