Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part I
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 12 (8) , 1044-1052
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00600.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Observational Research, Randomised Trials, and Two Views of Medical SciencePLoS Medicine, 2008
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studiesBMJ, 2007
- Developments in Post-marketing Comparative Effectiveness ResearchClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2007
- Testing multiple statistical hypotheses resulted in spurious associations: a study of astrological signs and healthJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Outpatient Gatifloxacin Therapy and Dysglycemia in Older AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Use of Health Care Databases in PharmacoepidemiologyBasic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 2006
- Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confoundingBMJ, 2005
- Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 1. Role and designBMJ, 2005
- Alvan Feinstein and the art of consulting: how to define a research questionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2002