The Science of Unitary Human Beings and Interpretive Human Science
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Nursing Science Quarterly
- Vol. 6 (1) , 13-24
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089431849300600107
Abstract
Natural science and human science are identified as the bases of most nursing theories and research programs. Natural science has been disclaimed by Martha Rogers as the philosophy of science that undergirds her work. The question remains, is the science of unitary human beings an interpretive human science? The author explores the works of Rogers through a dialectic with two human scientists' works. Wilhelm Dilthey's works represent the founding or traditional view, and Jurgen Habermas' works represent a contemporary, reconstructionist view. The ways Rogerian thought contributes to human studies but is distinct from traditional and reconstructionist human sciences are illuminated.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theoretic diversityAdvances in Nursing Science, 1991
- Nursing Science and Art: A ProspectiveNursing Science Quarterly, 1988
- Philosophical issues in the Rogerian science of unitary human beingsAdvances in Nursing Science, 1984
- A Reply to my CriticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- Introduction to the Theoretical Basis of NursingNursing Research, 1970
- Educational Revolution in NursingThe American Journal of Nursing, 1962