Body composition assessed on the basis of arm circumference and triceps skinfold thickness: a new index validated in children by magnetic resonance imaging
Open Access
- 1 June 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 65 (6) , 1709-1713
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/65.6.1709
Abstract
Fat and muscle areas can be calculated from equations on the basis of upper arm circumference (C) and triceps skinfold thickness (TS). These equations assume a circular limb and muscle compartment and a symmetrically distributed fat rim: total upper arm area (TUA) = C2/(4 pi), upper arm muscle area (UMA) = [C - (TS x pi)2]/(4 pi), and upper arm fat area (UFA) = TUA - UMA. This traditional method underestimates the degree of adiposity. We propose that the unrolled fat rim is a rectangle whose length = C and width = TS/2. The following new indexes are based on this assumption: upper arm fat area estimate (UFE) = C x (TS/2), and upper arm muscle area estimate (UME) = TUA - UFE. To validate these equations, areas were measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 28 children aged 9-15 y (17 control subjects and 11 obese subjects). Correlations between MRI and UFA and MRI and UFE were similar (r = 0.96 for both correlations in the control group and r = 0.84 and 0.82, respectively, in the obese group), but the areas assessed by MRI (13.8 cm2) were closer to UFE (12.4 cm2) than to UFA (11.2 cm2) in the control group as well as in the obese group (MRI = 48.7 cm2, UFE = 46.6 cm2, and UFA = 38.5 cm2). The limits of agreement between MRI and anthropometry were 5.7 +/- 5.8 cm2 for UFA and 0.6 +/- 5.0 cm2 for UFE, showing that UFA is not acceptable in most cases, whereas UFE measurements are close to MRI measurements. In conclusion, UFE and UME are simple and accurate indexes to assess body composition. French reference values are available from 1 mo to 17 y of age.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anthropometric reference data for international use: recommendations from a World Health Organization Expert CommitteeThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1996
- Arm muscle plus bone area: anthropometry and CAT scan comparedThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: revised equations for calculating bone-free arm muscle areaThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982
- Adiposity indices in childrenThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982
- New norms of upper limb fat and muscle areas for assessment of nutritional statusThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1981
- The growth of adipose tissue in children and adolescents. Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of adipose cell number and size.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1979
- Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1976
- Arm anthropometry in nutritional assessment: nomogram for rapid calculation of muscle circumference and cross-sectional muscle and fat areasThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1973
- The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thicknessBritish Journal of Nutrition, 1967