Likelihood ratio for trisomy 21 in fetuses with tricuspid regurgitation at the 11 to 13 + 6-week scan
- 6 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 26 (1) , 22-27
- https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1922
Abstract
Objective To determine the likelihood ratio for trisomy 21 in fetuses with tricuspid regurgitation at the 11 to 13 + 6‐week scan. Methods Fetal echocardiography was carried out by specialist pediatric cardiologists in 742 singleton pregnancies at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation and pulsed wave Doppler was used to ascertain the presence or absence of tricuspid regurgitation. To avoid confusion with other adjacent signals, a strict definition of tricuspid regurgitation was used, in that it had to occupy at least half of systole and reach a velocity of over 80 cm/s. The fetal crown–rump length (CRL) and the nuchal translucency (NT) thickness were measured and the presence of any congenital heart abnormality noted. Follow‐up of the pregnancy was carried out to determine the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. The likelihood ratio for trisomy 21 in fetuses with and without tricuspid regurgitation was determined. Results The tricuspid valve was successfully examined in 718 (96.8%) cases. Tricuspid regurgitation was present in 39 (8.5%) of the 458 chromosomally normal fetuses, in 82 (65.1%) of the 126 with trisomy 21, in 44 (53.0%) of the 83 with trisomy 18 or 13, and in 11 (21.6%) of the 51 with other chromosomal defects. The prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation was also associated with fetal CRL, delta NT and the presence of cardiac defects. Logistic regression analysis, irrespective of cardiac defects, demonstrated that in the chromosomally normal fetuses significant independent prediction of the likelihood of tricuspid regurgitation was provided by fetal delta NT (odds ratio (OR), 1.26; 95% CI, 1.34–1.41; P < 0.0001), while in trisomy 21 fetuses prediction was provided by CRL (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89–0.99; P = 0.021). The likelihood ratio for trisomy 21 for tricuspid regurgitation was derived by dividing the likelihood in trisomy 21 by that in normal fetuses. In the chromosomally normal fetuses, the prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation in those with cardiac defects was 46.9% and 5.6% in those without cardiac defects, and the likelihood ratio of tricuspid regurgitation for cardiac defects was 8.4. Conclusion At 11 to 13 + 6 weeks' gestation, there is a high association between tricuspid regurgitation and trisomy 21, as well as other chromosomal defects. The prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation increases with fetal NT thickness and is substantially higher in those with, than those without, a cardiac defect. Copyright © 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship between nuchal translucency thickness and prevalence of major cardiac defects in fetuses with normal karyotypeUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Tricuspid regurgitation in the diagnosis of chromosomal anomalies in the fetus at 11-14 weeks of gestationHeart, 2003
- Echocardiography in Early PregnancyJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2003
- Outcome of pregnancy in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency in the first trimesterUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001
- Trisomy 21: 91% detection rate using second‐trimester ultrasound markersUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Longitudinal observations in normally grown fetuses with tricuspid valve regurgitation: report of 22 casesPrenatal Diagnosis, 1999
- Using fetal nuchal translucency to screen for major congenital cardiac defects at 10-14 weeks of gestation: population based cohort studyBMJ, 1999
- UK multicentre project on assessment of risk of trisomy 21 by maternal age and fetal nuchal-translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestationThe Lancet, 1998
- Doppler Echocardiography of Normal and Abnormal Embryonic Mouse HeartPediatric Research, 1996
- The prevalence and clinical significance of fetal tricuspid valve regurgitation with normal heart anatomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994