Further studies of the helix dipole model: Effects of a free α‐NH3+ or α‐COO− group on helix stability
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 5 (1) , 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340050102
Abstract
Interactions between the α-helix peptide dipoles and charged groups close to the ends of the helix were found to be an important determinant of α-helix stability in a previous study.1 The charge on the N-terminal residue of the C-peptide from ribonuclease A was varied chiefly by changing the α-NH2 blocking group, and the correlation of helix stability with N-terminal charge was demonstrated. An alternative explanation for some of those results is that the succinyl and acetyl blocking groups stabilize the helix by hydrogen bonding to an unsatisfied main-chain NH group. The helix dipole model is tested here with peptides that contain either a free α-NH α-COO− groups, and no other charged groups that would titrate with similar pKa's. This model predicts that α-NH3α-COO- groups are helix-destabilizingand that the destabilizing interactions are electrostatic in origin. The hydrogen bonding model predicts that α-NH3 and α-COO- groups are not themselves helix-destabilizing, but that an acetyl or amide blocking group at the N- or C- terminus, respectively, stabilizes the helix by hydrogen bonding to an unsatisfied main-chain NH or CO group. The results are as follows: (1) Removal of the charge from α-NH3 and α-COO- groups by pH titration stabilizes an α-helix. (2) The increase in helix stability on pH titration of these groups is close to the increase produced by adding an acetyl or amide blocking group. (3) The helix-stabilizing effect of removing the charge from α-NH3 and α-COO- groups by pH titration is screened by increasing the NaCl concentration, and therefore the effect is electrostatic in origin. (4) Replacing the C-terminal amide blocking group with a methylester blocking group, which cannot donate a hydrogen bond, causes little change in helix stability.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Amino Acid Preferences for Specific Locations at the Ends of α HelicesScience, 1988
- Helix Signals in ProteinsScience, 1988
- Effect of sequence‐specific interactions on the stability of helical conformations in polypeptidesBiopolymers, 1988
- Stabilization of charges on isolated ionic groups sequestered in proteins by polarized peptide unitsNature, 1987
- The pKa values of two histidine residues in human haemoglobin, the Bohr effect, and the dipole moments of α-helicesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1985
- On the fundamental role of the glu 2−…Arg 10+ salt bridge in the folding of isolated ribonuclease a S-peptideBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1984
- A competing salt-bridge suppresses helix formation by the isolated C-peptide carboxylate of ribonuclease AJournal of Molecular Biology, 1982
- Mechanisms of protein and polypeptide helix initiationBiopolymers, 1975
- Statistical analysis of the distribution of amino acid residues among helical and non-helical regions in globular proteinsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1969
- The relation between amino acid sequence and protein conformationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1967