Poor Smokers, Poor Quitters, and Cigarette Tax Regressivity
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 94 (2) , 225-229
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.2.225
Abstract
The traditional view that excise taxes are regressive has been challenged. I document the history of the term regressive tax, show that traditional definitions have always found cigarette taxes to be regressive, and illustrate the implications of the greater price responsiveness observed among the poor. I explain the different definitions of tax burden: accounting, welfare-based willingness to pay, and welfare-based time inconsistent. Progressivity (equity across income groups) is sensitive to the way in which tax burden is assessed. Analysis of horizontal equity (fairness within a given income group) shows that cigarette taxes heavily burden poor smokers who do not quit, no matter how tax burden is assessed.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The economics of tobacco: myths and realitiesTobacco Control, 2000
- Response to Increases in Cigarette Prices by Race/Ethnicity, Income, and Age Groups—United States, 1976-1993Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Consumption Taxes in a Life-Cycle Framework: Are Sin Taxes Regressive?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1995
- Cigarette smoking by socioeconomic group, sex, and age: effects of price, income, and health publicityBMJ, 1994
- Policy Watch: Alcohol and Cigarette TaxesJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1993
- Rational Addictive Behavior and Cigarette SmokingJournal of Political Economy, 1991
- The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smokingJournal of Health Economics, 1991
- The Taxes of SinJAMA, 1989
- The taxes of sin. Do smokers and drinkers pay their way?JAMA, 1989
- A Theory of Rational AddictionJournal of Political Economy, 1988