Oral brivudin vs. intravenous acyclovir in the treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompromised patients: A randomized double‐blind trial

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The efficacy of oral brivudin vs. intravenous acyclovir was compared in a randomized multicentered study under double-blind conditions using the double-dummy technique. Forty-eight patients with a herpes zoster rash less than 72 hours in duration were entered in the study. Brivudin was given as one 125-mg tablet every 6 hours. Acyclovir was infused over 1 hour at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 8 hours. Treatment was continued for 5 days. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups when analyzed in terms of new lesion formation, increase in the area of rash within the primary dermatome, cutaneous dissemination, and affection of mucous membranes or visceral organs. Both treatment regimes were also equally effective in the time to full crusting of lesions. Oral brivudin and intravenous acyclovir were well tolerated by most patients. There was no need to interrupt the treatment in any case. As effective as intravenous acyclovir in the treatment of herpes zoster, oral brivudin offers the potential for outpatient treatment of herpes zoster in immunocompromised patients.