Expression of Claudin-1, a Recently Described Tight Junction-Associated Protein, Distinguishes Soft Tissue Perineurioma From Potential Mimics

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Perineuriomas are rare benign soft tissue tumors having an immunophenotype paralleling the normal perineurial cell [S-100 protein negative and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) positive]. Because EMA expression in perineuriomas may be focal and/or faint, there is continued interest in the development of new markers of perineurial differentiation. Perineurial cells differ from almost all other mesenchymal cell types by virtue of their formation of tight junctions. In the course of evaluating a group of novel tight junction-associated proteins, we noted high levels of expression of claudin-1 by normal perineurial cells and have systematically extended these observations to perineuriomas. Twelve EMA-positive/S-100-negative perineuriomas were retrieved from our consultation archives and compared with 39 tumors in the differential diagnosis of perineurioma (seven dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, eight low-grade fibromyxoid sarcomas, three desmoplastic fibroblastomas, seven fibromatoses, nine neurofibromas, and five schwannomas). All cases were immunostained for claudin-1 using standard avidin-biotin technique. Cases were scored as 3+ (>50% positive cells), 2+ (25–50% positive cells), and 1+ (5–24% positive cells). In all cases positive internal controls in the form of epithelium, normal perineurium, or endothelial cells were present. Positive staining for claudin-1 was visualized in a distinctly particulate pattern along the cell membrane. Cytoplasmic staining was infrequent and was not scored as positive. Claudin-1 expression was present in 11 of 12 (92%) perineuriomas studied (seven at 3+, three at 2+, and one at 1+). In all but two cases, the degree of claudin expression was equal to or greater than the corresponding EMA immunostain. Claudin-1 expression was not noted in any cases of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, desmoplastic fibroblastoma, or fibromatosis. Six of nine cases of neurofibroma contained a significant number of claudin-1-positive cells that were thought to be perineurial in origin, based on the staining of long, delicate cytoplasmic processes. One of four schwannomas contained a subpopulation of perivascular, dendritic, claudin-1-positive cells of presumed perineurial lineage. This is the first study to document expression of claudin-1 in perineurial cells and suggests a role for claudin-1 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of perineuriomas. Although claudin-1 should not replace EMA in the diagnosis of perineurioma, we think that it may play a valuable adjunctive role in difficult cases. In particular, claudin-1 is often a more robust marker than EMA in a given perineurioma. Claudin-1 is not expressed within the lesional cells of the mesenchymal tumors that enter into the differential diagnosis of perineurioma.