Long‐term effects of self‐management education for patients with Type 2 diabetes taking maximal oral hypoglycaemic therapy: a randomized trial in primary care
- 5 March 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Diabetic Medicine
- Vol. 21 (5) , 491-496
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01153.x
Abstract
Aims Education is an essential part of the management of patients with Type 2 diabetes, but the long-term effects are unclear and not well investigated in primary care. Methods Fifty-four patients (39-75 years) treated with maximal dosages of oral hypoglycaemic agents, needing to start insulin (HbA(1c) greater than or equal to 7.0%), were randomly allocated to a 6-month educational programme by a diabetes nurse (DN group) or usual care (UC group). Main outcome measures were HbA(1c), number of patients with HbA(1c) <7.0%, and number of patients treated with insulin IS months after baseline. Results Six weeks after the intervention HbA(1c) levels had improved from 8.2 (1.1) to 7.2 (1.3) in the DN group, and from 8.8 (1.5) to 8.4 (1.7) in the UC group. Adjusted for baseline values, at 6 weeks HbA(1c) improved 0.7% (95% confidence interval 0.1, 1.4) more in DN than in UC. Of the patients in DN, 60% reached HbA(1c) <7.0% compared with 17% in UC (P <0.01). However, at 18 months there were no significant differences for HbA(1c), number of patients with HbA(1c) <7.0%, or number treated with insulin. Conclusions Education was effective in improving glycaemic control and in delaying the need for insulin therapy in patients treated with maximal oral hypoglycaemic therapy. The reduced effect after 1 year was probably due to the discontinuation of the educational programme. Short-term education should not be offered without regular reinforcements integrated into standard diabetes careKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus without insulin therapyDiabetic Medicine, 2003
- Quality of recording of data from patients with type 2 diabetes is not a valid indicator of quality of care. A cross-sectional studyFamily Practice, 2003
- Inside GuidelinesDiabetes Care, 2002
- The Prevention or Delay of Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2002
- Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 2002
- Statistics Notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurementsBMJ, 2001
- Metabolic control and morbidity of Type 2 diabetic patients in a general practice networkFamily Practice, 1999
- How to deal with regression to the mean in intervention studiesThe Lancet, 1996
- U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 16: Overview of 6 Years' Therapy of Type II Diabetes: A Progressive DiseaseDiabetes, 1995
- Prospective Evaluation of HDL Cholesterol Changes After Diet and Physical Conditioning Programs for Patients with Type II Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Care, 1985