Comparison of contracted Schrödinger and coupled-cluster theories
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review A
- Vol. 60 (6) , 4396-4408
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.60.4396
Abstract
The theory of the contracted Schrödinger equation (CSE) [D. A. Mazziotti, Phys. Rev. A 57, 4219 (1998)] is connected with traditional methods of electronic structure including configuration-interaction (CI) and coupled-cluster (CC) theory. We derive a transition contracted Schrödinger equation (TCSE) which depends on the wave function as well as another N-particle function through the two-, three-, and four-particle reduced transition matrices (RTMs). By reconstructing the 3 and 4 RTMs approximately from the 2-RTM, the indeterminacy of the equation may be removed. The choice of the reconstruction and the function determines whether one obtains the CI, CC, or CSE theory. Through cumulant theory and Grassmann algebra we derive reconstruction formulas for the 3- and 4-RTMs which generalize both the reduced density matrix (RDM) cumulant expansions as well as the exponential ansatz for the CC wave function. This produces a fresh approach to CC theory through RTMs. Two theoretical differences between the CC and the CSE theories are established for energetically nondegenerate states: (i) while the CSE has a single exact solution when the 3- and 4-RDMs are N-representable, the CC equations with N-representable 3- and 4-RTMs have a family of solutions. Thus, N-representability conditions offer a medium for improving the CSE solution but not the CC solution, and (ii) while the 2-RDM for an electronic Hamiltonian reconstructs to unique N-representable 3- and 4-RDMs, the 2-RTM builds to a family of N-representable 3- and 4-RTMs. Hence, renormalized reconstructions beyond the cumulant expansion may be developed for the 2-RDM but not for the 2-RTM without explicit use of the Hamiltonian. In the applications we implement our recently developed reconstruction formula for the 3-RDM which extends beyond the cumulant approximation. Calculations compare the 3-RDM and 3-RTM reconstructions for the molecules LiH, and as well as for systems with more general two-particle interactions. The TCSE offers a unified approach to electronic structure.
Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct determination of the quantum-mechanical density matrix: Parquet theoryPhysical Review A, 1999
- 3,5-contracted Schrödinger equation: Determining quantum energies and reduced density matrices without wave functionsInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 1998
- Contracted Schrödinger equation: Determining quantum energies and two-particle density matrices without wave functionsPhysical Review A, 1998
- Approximate solution for electron correlation through the use of Schwinger probesChemical Physics Letters, 1998
- Direct determination of the quantum-mechanical density matrix using the density equation. II.Physical Review A, 1997
- Direct Determination of the Quantum-Mechanical Density Matrix Using the Density EquationPhysical Review Letters, 1996
- Reduction of the N-Particle Variational ProblemJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1964
- Structure of Fermion Density MatricesReviews of Modern Physics, 1963
- Theory and applications of the density matrixReports on Progress in Physics, 1961
- Some Recent Advances in Density Matrix TheoryReviews of Modern Physics, 1960