Continuous Versus Bolus Dosing of Furosemide for Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure
- 30 April 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 105 (12) , 1794-1797
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.01.355
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- End Points for Clinical Trials in Acute Heart Failure SyndromesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2009
- Loop Diuretics in Acute Decompensated Heart FailureCirculation: Heart Failure, 2009
- Cardiorenal SyndromeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008
- Frusemide Administration in Critically Ill Patients by Continuous Compared to Bolus TherapyNephron Clinical Practice, 2007
- Continuous infusion versus bolus injection of loop diuretics in congestive heart failureCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005
- Characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for heart failure in the United States: Rationale, design, and preliminary observations from the first 100,000 cases in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE)American Heart Journal, 2005
- Effects of high-dose furosemide and small-volume hypertonic saline solution infusion in comparison with a high dose of furosemide as bolus in refractory congestive heart failure: Long-term effectsAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Protocol-guided diuretic managementCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Diuretic Efficacy of High Dose Furosemide in Severe Heart Failure: Bolus Injection Versus Continuous InfusionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Diuretic efficacy of high dose furosemide in severe heart failure: Bolus injection versus continuous infusionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996