Factors associated with non-participation and drop-out in a lifestyle intervention for workers with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease
Open Access
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
- Vol. 6 (1) , 80
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-80
Abstract
Background Non-response and drop-out are problems that are commonly encountered in health promotion trials. Understanding the health-related characteristics of non-participants and drop-outs and the reasons for non-participation and drop-out may be beneficial for future intervention trials. Methods Male construction workers with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were invited to participate in a lifestyle intervention study. In order to investigate the associations between participation and CVD risk factors, and drop-out and CVD risk factors, crude and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. The reasons for non-participation and drop-out were assessed qualitatively. Results 20% of the workers who were invited decided to participate; 8.6% of the participants dropped out before the first follow-up measurement. The main reasons for non-participation were 'no interest', 'current (para-)medical treatment', and 'feeling healthy', and for drop-out they were 'lack of motivation', 'current (para-)medical treatment', and 'disappointment'. Participants were 4.2 years older, had a higher blood pressure, higher total cholesterol, and lower HDL cholesterol than non-participants, and were more likely to report 'tiredness and/or stress' and 'chest pain and/or shortness of breath'. After adjusting for age, most risk factors were not significantly associated with participation. Drop-outs were 4.6 years younger than those who completed the study. The prevalence of smoking was higher among non-participants and drop-outs. Conclusion Participants had a worse CVD risk profile than non-participants, mainly because of the difference in age. Non-participants and drop-outs were younger and more likely to be smokers. The main reasons for non-participation and drop-out were health-related. Investigators in the field of health promotion should be encouraged to share comparable information. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN60545588Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determinants of participation in worksite health promotion programmes: a systematic reviewInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2009
- Motives for (not) participating in a lifestyle intervention trialBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2008
- Design of a RCT evaluating the (cost-) effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention for male construction workers at risk for cardiovascular disease: The Health under Construction studyBMC Public Health, 2008
- Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in General Practice: Mismatch between Cardiovascular Risk and Patients' Risk PerceptionsMedical Decision Making, 2007
- Effectiveness of an Intensive Nutritional Intervention in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results from a Pilot StudyThe Review of Diabetic Studies, 2007
- Patients' Perceptions of Cholesterol, Cardiovascular Disease Risk, and Risk Communication StrategiesAnnals of Family Medicine, 2006
- If you build it, will they come?Patient Education and Counseling, 2002
- A randomized trial of cardiovascular risk factor reduction: patterns of attrition after randomization and during follow-upJournal of Cardiovascular Risk, 1997
- Efficacy of Computerized Health Risk Appraisal as Part of a Periodic Health Examination at the WorksiteAmerican Journal of Health Promotion, 1995
- Participation in Worksite Health Promotion: A Critique of the Literature and Recommendations for Future PracticeHealth Education Quarterly, 1993