Misunderstandings about the Effects of Race and Sex on Physicians' Referrals for Cardiac Catheterization
- 22 July 1999
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 341 (4) , 279-283
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199907223410411
Abstract
In the February 25 issue of the Journal, Schulman et al. claimed that the “race and sex of a patient independently influence how physicians manage chest pain.”1 Their study received extensive coverage in the news media. It was reported in most major newspapers26 and was a feature story on ABC's Nightline, with Surgeon General David Satcher providing commentary.7 Unfortunately, in each case, the results were overstated. We explore what went wrong and suggest ways to improve the communication of data to the public. Our purpose is not to deny the occurrence of racial or sex bias, rather to emphasize . . .Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Race, Sex, and Physicians' Referrals for Cardiac CatheterizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians' Recommendations for Cardiac CatheterizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Avoiding the Unintended Consequences of Growth in Medical CareJAMA, 1999
- What's the Relative Risk?JAMA, 1998
- Outcomes in Patients with Acute Non–Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Randomly Assigned to an Invasive as Compared with a Conservative Management StrategyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- When can odds ratios mislead?BMJ, 1998
- The Role of Numeracy in Understanding the Benefit of Screening MammographyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- The bias caused by high values of incidence for p1 in the odds ratio assumption that 1 − p1 − 1Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1986