A Monte Carlo Study of Alternative Responses To Intraclass Correlation in Community Trials
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 20 (3) , 313-337
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9602000305
Abstract
Strategies to avoid the penalties of extra variation and reduced degrees offreedom in community trials were compared in Monte Carlo simulations Three conditions were found necessary to ensure nominal Type I and II error rates: (a) Condition variation must be assessed against assignment unit variation, (b) the critical value for the test statistic must be based on the assignment unit degrees offreedom, and (c) estimation of negative intraclass correlations must be allowed in the analysis. Using other test statistics and other degrees of freedom, and fixing negative intraclass correlations at zero often gave Type I and II error rates far from their nominal levels.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Batch Sampling To Improve Power in a Community TrialEvaluation Review, 1996
- Design and Analysis Issues in Community TrialsEvaluation Review, 1994
- PARAMETERS TO AID IN THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMMUNITY TRIALSEpidemiology, 1994
- An Analysis of Variance Pitfall: The Fixed Effects Analysis in a Nested DesignEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1990
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986
- Comment on "Statistical Power with Group Mean as the Unit of Analysis"Journal of Educational Statistics, 1986
- Monte Carlo Comparison of ANOVA, MIVQUE, REML, and ML Estimators of Variance ComponentsTechnometrics, 1984
- SYMPOSIUM ON CHD PREVENTION TRIALS: DESIGN ISSUES IN TESTING LIFE STYLE INTERVENTIONAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1978
- Maximum Likelihood Approaches to Variance Component Estimation and to Related ProblemsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1977