Changing Paradigms in Research: Do We Need to Rethink the Future?
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Progress in Palliative Care
- Vol. 8 (4) , 193-197
- https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2000.11746878
Abstract
Evidence-based practice is the current buzz-word of healthcare practice. It draws on a positivist approach to research centred on the randomised controlled trial. While it is imperative that palliative care embrace evidence-based approaches to patient and family care, at least two key barriers exist. Firstly, palliative care developed as a reaction against positivist science and its approaches to healthcare provision. Consequently, its field of inquiry, and what it counts as evidence, is significantly broader than can be assessed using randomised controlled trials. Secondly, even when appropriate, attempts to conduct randomised controlled trials in palliative care have largely failed. This paper explores the relationship between palliative care and evidence-based practice through a critique of randomised controlled trials as the benchmark for evidence in palliative care.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature reviewPalliative Medicine, 1999
- The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature reviewPalliative Medicine, 1999
- Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn'tBMJ, 1996
- Trials in palliative careBMJ, 1995
- Need for rigorous assessment of palliative careBMJ, 1994
- Evaluation of a palliative care service: problems and pitfallsBMJ, 1994
- Moral Agency in NursingNursing Forum, 1994
- Randomised controlled trial of effects of coordinating care for terminally ill cancer patients.BMJ, 1992
- The routinization of hospice: Charisma and bureaucratizationSocial Science & Medicine, 1992
- PROGNOSTIC UNCERTAINTY IN TERMINAL CARE: CAN THE KARNOFSKY INDEX HELP?The Lancet, 1985