Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment
- 1 December 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 15 (S1) , S93-S108
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9
Abstract
The relatively high rate of failed back surgery has prompted the search for “risk factors” to predict the result of spinal surgery in a given individual. However, the literature reveals few unequivocal predictors and they often explain a relatively low proportion of variance in outcome. This suggests that we have a long way to go before being able to rest easily, having refused someone surgery on the basis of unfavourable baseline characteristics. The best recommendation is to ensure, firstly, that the indication for surgery is absolutely clear-cut (i.e. that surgically remediable pathology exists) and then to consider the various factors that may influence the “typical” outcome. Consistent risk factors for a poor outcome regarding return-to-work include long-term sick leave/receipt of disability benefit. Hence, every effort should be made to keep the individual in the workforce, despite the ongoing symptoms and plans for surgery. In patients with a particularly heavy job, consultation with occupational physicians might later ease the patient’s way back into the workplace. Patients with degenerative disorders and/or comorbidity should be counselled that few of them will have complete/lasting pain relief or a complete return to pre-morbid function. Patients with a high level of distress may benefit from psychological treatment, before and/or accompanying the surgical treatment. The opportunity (time), encouragement (education and positive messages), and resources (referral to appropriate support services) to modify risk factors that are indeed modifiable should be offered, and realistic expectations should be discussed with the patient before the decision to operate is made.Keywords
This publication has 93 references indexed in Scilit:
- A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosisEuropean Spine Journal, 2004
- Longitudinal validation of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) in a Swiss-German sample of low back pain patientsEuropean Spine Journal, 2004
- Entwicklung und empirische berpr fung des Deutschen Schmerzfragebogens der DGSSDer Schmerz, 2002
- Outcome Assessments in the Evaluation of Treatment of Spinal DisordersSpine, 2000
- Secondary gain influences the outcome of lumbar but not cervical disc surgerySurgical Neurology, 1999
- Coping und Genesungsverlauf nach lumbaler BandscheibenoperationDer Schmerz, 1999
- A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disabilityPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- The Distress and Risk Assessment MethodSpine, 1992
- Comparison of Eight Psychometric Instruments in Unselected Patients with Back PainSpine, 1991
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977