Medium-term results of permanent sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence
Open Access
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 89 (7) , 896-901
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02119.x
Abstract
Background Anal sphincter surgery for faecal incontinence is associated with significant morbidity and a variable outcome. Sacral nerve stimulation may provide a good functional outcome with minimal morbidity. This paper reports the experience in a single centre over 5 years. Methods Fifteen consecutive patients (14 women), median age 60 (range 37–71) years, underwent temporary, and subsequent permanent, stimulation. All had incontinence to solid or liquid stool; the aetiology was obstetric injury (seven patients), scleroderma (four), idiopathic (two), fistula surgery (one) and repaired rectal prolapse (one). Median duration of symptoms was 6 (range 2–15) years. Clinical evaluation, endoanal ultrasonography, bowel diary, quality of life questionnaire (Short Form (SF) 36) and anorectal physiological testing were performed before and after stimulation. Results Continence had improved in all patients at median follow-up of 24 (range 3–60) months. Eleven patients were fully continent. Episodes of faecal incontinence decreased from median (range) 11 (2–30) per week before stimulation to 0 (0–4) per week after permanent stimulation (P < 0·001). Urgency improved in all patients (median (range) ability to defer less than 1 (0–1) versus 8 (1–15) min; P = 0·01). ‘Social function’ and ‘role-physical’ subscales of the SF36 improved significantly. Mean resting pressure (35 versus 49 cmH2O with temporary stimulation; P < 0·05) and squeeze pressure increment (43 versus 69 cmH2O with permanent stimulation; P < 0·01) increased. Rectal sensitivity to initial distension changed (mean 47 versus 34 ml air; P < 0·05). There were no major complications. Conclusion Sacral nerve stimulation is a safe and effective treatment for faecal incontinence when conventional treatment has failed. There is minimal morbidity. The benefit is maintained in the medium term.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinenceDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Topical phenylephrine increases anal canal resting pressure in patients with faecal incontinenceGut, 2001
- Chronic sacral spinal nerve stimulation for fecal incontinenceDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Randomized, controlled trial of topical phenylephrine for fecal incontinence in patients after ileoanal pouch constructionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000
- Safety and efficacy of dynamic graciloplasty for fecal incontinenceDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2000
- Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric traumaThe Lancet, 2000
- Outcome of biofeedback for faecal incontinenceBritish Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Outcome of patients with an implanted artificial anal sphincter for severe faecal incontinenceInternational Journal of Colorectal Disease, 1998
- Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinenceThe Lancet, 1995
- Electrical Stimulation in the Clinical Management of the Neurogenic BladderJournal of Urology, 1988