Managed Competition versus Industrial Purchasing of Health Care among the Fortune 500
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Duke University Press in Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
- Vol. 27 (1) , 5-30
- https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-27-1-5
Abstract
The theory of managed competition has found favor with many health policy analysts and academic economists alike. Three characteristics—consumer choice, defined contribution, and dissemination of information—signal managed competition strategy. By requiring private employers to provide their employees with a choice of health carriers, a fixed-dollar strategy (defined contribution), and quality information to make appropriate choices among carriers, managed competition offers to remedy imperfections in both the consumer and provider sides of the market for health insurance. In an extensive survey of health care purchasing practices among Fortune 500 companies we found that major companies are not using the managed competition approach to health care purchasing. Instead, most of the companies surveyed are purchasing health care in the same way as they do other inputs to production—a pattern we call industrial purchasing.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Does Managed Care Do It?The RAND Journal of Economics, 2000
- Managed Competition In Practice: ‘Value Purchasing’ By Fourteen EmployersHealth Affairs, 1998
- Adverse Selection in Health InsuranceForum for Health Economics and Policy, 1998
- Managed Competition and California's Health Care EconomyHealth Affairs, 1996
- Stanford UniversityInternational Anesthesiology Clinics, 1995
- Budget Limits And Managed Competition: Allies, Not AntagonistsHealth Affairs, 1993
- Informing And Protecting Consumers Under Managed CompetitionHealth Affairs, 1993
- The Jackson Hole initiatives for a twenty‐first century American health care systemHealth Economics, 1992
- Employers And Managed Care: What Are The Early Returns?Health Affairs, 1991
- Effective Management of Competition in the FEHBPHealth Affairs, 1989