Implications of low diagnostic reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic diagnoses.
- 21 March 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 285 (11) , 1506-8
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.11.1506
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interobserver Reproducibility of Cervical Cytologic and Histologic InterpretationsRealistic Estimates From the ASCUS-LSIL Triage StudyJAMA, 2001
- Atypical epithelial cells and specimen adequacy: current laboratory practices of participants in the college of American pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology.Published by Wiley ,2000
- Interobserver variability in subclassification of squamous intraepithelial lesions: Results of the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.Published by Wiley ,1999
- Subclassifying atypical squamous cells in Thin-Prep cervical cytology correlates with detection of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA.American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1999
- Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based preparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories.Acta Cytologica, 1999
- Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and a fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screeningObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Specimen Adequacy of ThinPrep Sample Preparations in a Direct-to-Vial StudyActa Cytologica, 1997
- The Bethesda System for reporting cervical/vaginal cytologic diagnoses: Definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes for terminology and specimen adequacyHuman Pathology, 1994
- False negative rate in cervical cytology.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1987