Reversal Learning in Octopus Vulgaris Lamarck with and without Irrelevant Cues
Open Access
- 1 December 1963
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 15 (4) , 236-242
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216308416332
Abstract
Three groups of eight octopuses each were trained on a brightness discrimination and its reversal. Within each group half the animals were overtrained on the original problem and half were not. For Group I the discrimination was a simple one, for the other two groups irrelevant cues were introduced (for Group II position and for Group III orientation). It was found that the overtrained animals learnt the reversal significantly faster than the non-overtrained only where irrelevant cues were present (i.e. only in Groups II and III). The results are discussed in relation to various theories of discrimination reversal.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE EFFECT OF IRRELEVANT CUES ON REVERSAL LEARNING IN THE RATBritish Journal of Psychology, 1963
- The effects of overtraining on a reversal and a nonreversal shift.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962
- An Investigation of Reversal Learning in Octopus Vulgaris LamarckQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- Analysis of the role of overlearning in discrimination reversal.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961
- Reversal learning by paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis).Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1960
- Effects of extinction trials on discrimination reversal.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960
- VISUAL DISCRIMINATION OF ORIENTATION BY OCTOPUSBritish Journal of Psychology, 1957
- The facilitation of visual and spatial discrimination reversal by overlearning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1956
- Breadth of learning as a function of drive level and mechanization.Psychological Review, 1955
- The development of noncontinuity behavior through continuity learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953