Coherence and Conservation
- 17 November 2000
- journal article
- other
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 290 (5495) , 1360-1364
- https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5495.1360
Abstract
A principal aim of current conservation policy is to reduce the impact of habitat fragmentation. Conservation corridors may achieve this goal by facilitating movement among isolated patches, but there is a risk that increased connectivity could synchronize local population fluctuations (causing coherent oscillations) and thereby increase the danger of global extinction. We identify general conditions under which populations can or cannot undergo coherent oscillations, and we relate these conditions to local and global extinction probabilities. We suggest a simple method to explore the potential success of conservation corridors and, more generally, any manipulations of dispersal patterns that aim to protect threatened species or control pests.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inverse density dependence and the Allee effectPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity?Conservation Biology, 1998
- Chaos, Dispersal and Extinction in Coupled EcosystemsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1998
- Chaos in a Noisy World: New Methods and Evidence from Time-Series AnalysisThe American Naturalist, 1995
- Low levels of immigration between chaotic populations can reduce system extinctions by inducing asynchronous regular cyclesProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1994
- Persistence of Transients in Spatially Structured Ecological ModelsScience, 1994
- Chaos in Ecology: Is Mother Nature a Strange Attractor?Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1993
- Period-doubling reversals and chaos in simple ecological modelsNature, 1993
- Chaotic but regular posi-nega switch among coded attractors by cluster-size variationPhysical Review Letters, 1989
- Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamicsNature, 1976