Magnitude and likelihood of loss resulting from non‐stratified randomization
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 1 (3) , 267-275
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780010308
Abstract
We investigate the power of detecting treatment differences by the stratified logrank test for balanced samples as compared to samples with unequal allocation to treatments within strata. Given non‐stratified randomization to treatments, we relate power losses to their probability of occurrence. In addition, we evaluate the likelihood of zero cells. For power calculations, we employ an asymptotic formula and complement by Monte Carlo simulations to verify results in small samples. In the cases investigated, our results show that large power losses due to imbalance are relatively unlikely with 2 strata. Small strata, however, involve a non‐negligible probability of wasting all observations because of zero cells or censoring.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributionsBiometrika, 1981
- Statistical controversies in the design of clinical trials—Some personal viewsControlled Clinical Trials, 1980
- Comparison of Four Tests for Equality of Survival Curves in the Presence of Stratification and CensoringBiometrika, 1979
- Restricted Randomization Designs in Clinical TrialsBiometrics, 1979
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976
- Asymptotic Normality of a New Nonparametric Statistic for Use in Organ Transplant StudiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974