Flexibility in Norwegian and UK firms: competitive pressure and institutional embeddedness
- 1 December 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Employee Relations
- Vol. 19 (6) , 568-580
- https://doi.org/10.1108/01425459710367916
Abstract
Discusses critically the concept of numerical flexibility arguing that strategies for numerical flexibility may in part be viewed as “emergent” strategies. Argues further that “emergent” strategies evolve as responses to the national institutional context. This context comprises laws and regulations which constrain firms from introducing numerical flexibility and trade unions which, acting on behalf of their members, will attempt to limit the scope of numerical flexibility. Demonstrates that since the 1980s the institutional contexts in which Norwegian and UK firms operate have diverged significantly, leading to expected differing rates of increased use of numerical flexibility. This is tested through a multivariate analysis of variations in numerical flexibility at the firm level on the basis of data from the 1995 Euronet‐Cranfield Survey.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative research in human resource management: a review and an exampleThe International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1996
- Trends in Employer-Funded Training as an Indicator of Changes in Employment: The Case of Norway in the 1980S.Adult Education Quarterly, 1995
- Determinants of Employment Externalization: A Study of Temporary Workers and Independent ContractorsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1993
- Employment Relations and the Labor Market: Integrating Institutional and Market PerspectivesAmerican Sociological Review, 1991
- Core and Periphery in Employers' Workforce Strategies: Evidence from the 1987 E.L.U.S. SurveyWork, Employment & Society, 1990
- Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American WorkplaceAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1990
- The `Flexible Firm': Fixation or Fact?Work, Employment & Society, 1988
- The Practice of Strategic Human Resource ManagementPersonnel Review, 1986
- The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational FieldsAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order CategoriesAmerican Sociological Review, 1970