The media and public opinion on genetics and biotechnology: mirrors, windows, or walls?
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Public Understanding of Science
- Vol. 14 (3) , 305-316
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505052888
Abstract
Arguments regarding the relationship between media discourse and public opinion have raged for decades, if not centuries. Comparing media coverage of biotechnology between 1992 and 2001 in two national newspapers with national survey data collected in early 2003, an argument is made that a general one-dimensional media effect is not occurring within the US public regarding media discourse. Given the multivalent characteristics of the media and the interpretive filters used by audiences—including ignoring information—even strong slants by the presumed opinion-leading press (the New York Times and the Washington Post) do not predict public opinion on a nascent issue such as biotechnology. While some reflections do appear between the media and public opinion, closer observations show these mirrors to be ephemeral.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The National Media and Things GeneticScience Communication, 2003
- Biotechnology and the American MediaScience Communication, 2002
- Shaping a Food Safety DebateScience Communication, 1999
- Learning to consume: An ethnographic study of cultural change in HungaryCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1995
- Consuming the exotic otherCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1995
- Reopening the Black Box: Toward a Limited Effects TheoryJournal of Communication, 1993
- Biased Press or Biased Public? Attitudes Toward Media Coverage of Social GroupsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1992
- Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist ApproachAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1989
- The Impact of Mass Media Violence on U.S. HomicidesAmerican Sociological Review, 1983
- The Demonstration of Power: Violence Profile No. 10Journal of Communication, 1979