The Constitution as Symbol
- 1 April 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Politics Quarterly
- Vol. 8 (2) , 237-256
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x8000800206
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the symbolic meaning of the Constitution. To accomplish this, 324 subjects were administered a 60-item Q-sort consisting of state ments of opinion about the Constitution. The data were correlated and factor analyzed, resulting in three factors. The first factor represents the predominating viewpoint that the Constitution is a masterpiece and should always be kept sacred. However, persons with this viewpoint see that the Constitution contains some loopholes which have allowed it to be interpreted to suit the needs of a few. The second factordescribes the Constitution as deprivational and to persons with this viewpoint the Constitution represents most of what is bad about America. The third factor represents a "realist" viewpoint which recognizes the deprivational potential of the Constitution but sees the functional value of the document as well. The results indicate that the symbolic potential of the Consti tution is probably still intact.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Constitution as Symbol: The Interpersonal Sources of Meaning of a Secondary SymbolAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1979
- The Supreme Court and Critical ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1975
- The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical InvestigationLaw & Society Review, 1974
- The Political Uses of SymbolismAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1973
- Generating Rules for Intensive AnalysisPsychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 1973
- Consensus and Ideology in American PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 1964
- An aid in calculating Q-sort factor-arraysJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1955
- Constitution and Court as SymbolsThe Yale Law Journal, 1937
- The Constitution as Instrument and as Symbol.American Political Science Review, 1936
- The Constitution as an InstitutionColumbia Law Review, 1934