Activities of Antifungal Agents against Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi: Assessment according to the Methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 52 (10) , 3637-3641
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00662-08
Abstract
We compared the activities of antifungal agents against a wide range of yeasts and filamentous fungi. The methodology of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) for yeasts and spore-forming molds was applied; and a total of 349 clinical isolates of Candida spp., other yeast species, Aspergillus spp., and nondermatophyte non-Aspergillus spp. were investigated. The average geometric mean (GM) of the MICs of the various drugs for Candida spp. were as follows: amphotericin B (AMB), 0.55 microg/ml; liposomal amphotericin B (l-AMB); 0.35 microg/ml; itraconazole (ITC), 0.56 microg/ml; voriconazole (VRC), 0.45 microg/ml; posaconazole (POS), 0.44 microg/ml; and caspofungin (CPF), 0.45 microg/ml. The data indicated that the majority of Candida spp. were susceptible to the traditional and new antifungal drugs. For Aspergillus spp., the average GM MICs of AMB, l-AMB, ITC, VRC, POS, and CPF were 1.49 microg/ml, 1.44 microg/ml, 0.65 microg/ml, 0.34 microg/ml, 0.25 microg/ml, and 0.32 microg/ml, respectively. For the various zygomycetes, the average GM MICs of AMB, l-AMB, ITC, and POS were 1.36 microg/ml, 1.42 microg/ml, 4.37 microg/ml, and 1.65 microg/ml, respectively. Other yeastlike fungi and molds displayed various patterns of susceptibility. In general, the minimal fungicidal concentrations were 1 to 3 dilutions higher than the corresponding MICs. POS, AMB, and l-AMB showed activities against a broader range of fungi than ITC, VRC, and CPF did. Emerging pathogens such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Fusarium solani were not killed by any drug. In summary, the EUCAST data showed that the in vitro susceptibilities of yeasts and filamentous fungi are variable, that susceptibility occurs among and within various genera and species, and that susceptibility depends on the antifungal drug tested. AMB, l-AMB, and POS were active against the majority of pathogens, including species that cause rare and difficult-to-treat infections.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- EUCAST Technical Note on fluconazoleClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2008
- Effects of Serum on In Vitro Susceptibility Testing of EchinocandinsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2007
- Quality Control and Reference Guidelines for CLSI Broth Microdilution Method (M38-A Document) for Susceptibility Testing of Anidulafungin against MoldsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2007
- Pseudallescheria Boydii Infection After Liver RetransplantationLiver Transplantation, 2007
- Multiple-Triazole–Resistant AspergillosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- In Vitro Activities of Amphotericin B and Voriconazole against Aleurioconidia from Aspergillus terreusAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2005
- In vitro susceptibilities of bloodstream isolates of Candida species to six antifungal agents: results from a population-based active surveillance programme, Barcelona, Spain, 2002–2003Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2005
- In vitro susceptibilities of rare Candida bloodstream isolates to ravuconazole and three comparative antifungal agentsDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2004
- Optimal Testing Conditions for Determining MICs and Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations of New and Established Antifungal Agents for Uncommon Molds: NCCLS Collaborative StudyJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Fungal infections in cancer patients: An international autopsy surveyEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1992