Populists, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Party Politics
- Vol. 15 (1) , 29-48
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808097890
Abstract
In this article, I attempt to clarify the relationships among three contemporary concepts that are often used interchangeably or conflated in the literature: anti-establishment politics, political outsiders and populism. In order to make sense of these manifestations of public discontent, I argue that one must examine the nature of political appeals, political actors' locations vis-à-vis the party system and the linkages between citizens and government. Doing so, furthermore, helps clarify the meaning of populism, one of the most elusive concepts in political science. The definition of populism I offer allows us to synthesize much of the literature on the subject while weeding out unnecessary and secondary characteristics. Importantly, too, this definition allows us to separate competing claims of `direct democracy' and thus populists from non-populists.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Species of Political PartiesParty Politics, 2003
- From Labor Politics to Machine Politics: The Transformation of Party-Union Linkages in Argentine Peronism, 1983-1999Latin American Research Review, 2003
- Populism and the Pathology of Representative PoliticsPublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Populism Italian StylePublished by Springer Nature ,2002
- Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American PoliticsComparative Politics, 2001
- Politicians against parties: Anti‐party arguments as weapons for change in GermanyEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1996
- The intellectual basis of right‐wing anti‐partyismEuropean Journal of Political Research, 1996
- The Populist Challenge to Élitist Democracy in EuropePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1996
- The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A SymposiumWorld Politics, 1995