Gender, race, and perceived risk: The 'white male' effect
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Health, Risk & Society
- Vol. 2 (2) , 159-172
- https://doi.org/10.1080/713670162
Abstract
Risks tend to be judged lower by men than by women and by white people than by people of colour. Prior research by Flynn, Slovic and Mertz [Risk Analysis, 14, pp. 1101-1108] found that these race and gender differences in risk perception in the United States were primarily due to 30% of the white male population who judge risks to be extremely low. The specificity of this finding suggests an explanation in terms of sociopolitical factors rather than biological factors. The study reported here presents new data from a recent national survey conducted in the United States. Although white males again stood apart with respect to their judgements of risk and their attitudes concerning worldviews, trust, and risk-related stigma, the results showed that the distinction between white males and others is more complex than originally thought. Further investigation of sociopolitical factors in risk judgements is recommended to clarify gender and racial differences.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facts and values in risk assessmentReliability Engineering & System Safety, 1998
- Science, Values, and RiskThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996
- Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health RisksRisk Analysis, 1994
- Gender-specific reactions to environmental hazards in the NetherlandsSex Roles, 1993
- Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical RisksRisk Analysis, 1992
- Sex Differences in Attitudes toward Nuclear WarJournal of Peace Research, 1991
- Public Perceptions of the Risks and Benefits of Technology1Risk Analysis, 1989
- Tolerance for Environmental Health Risks: The Influence of Knowledge, Benefits, Voluntariness, and Environmental AttitudesRisk Analysis, 1986
- Differences by Sex in Support for Nuclear PowerSocial Forces, 1984
- Contrasting risk judgments among interest groupsActa Psychologica, 1984