Clinical interpretation of reference intervals and reference limits. A plea for assay harmonization
- 5 January 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in cclm
- Vol. 42 (7) , 752-7
- https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm.2004.127
Abstract
Reference intervals for healthy subjects and diseased populations are important benchmarks for the clinical interpretation of laboratory test values. It is important that the testing conditions used to collect the reference data be closely matched with the testing conditions used for patient data. Interlaboratory differences and intralaboratory changes, especially changes in analytic set-points, can markedly affect the clinical interpretation of tests. If laboratory testing methods could be harmonized, laboratories could potentially share reference data to make these data more reliable.This chapter illustrates the use of reference intervals for healthy subjects and reference data from diseased populations for medical decisions. One example illustrates the effects of age differences on test result interpretation. Other examples illustrate use of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and combinations of TSH with free thyroxine measurements for diagnosing thyroid diseases. Both univariate and multivariate reference intervals are discussed. Model systems for using disease prevalence and cost utility functions are provided to illustrate optimization of medical decisions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Reducing the Upper Limit of Normal TSH ValuesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2003
- The Data Warehouse as a Foundation for Population-Based Reference IntervalsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2003
- What's different about older peopleToxicology, 2003
- Laboratory Support for the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Thyroid DiseaseThyroid®, 2003
- Objective evaluation of data in screening for diseaseClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2001
- Evaluation of systematic and random factors in measurements of fasting plasma glucose as the basis for analytical quality specifications in the diagnosis of diabetes. 3. Impact of the new WHO and ADA recommendations on diagnosis of diabetes mellitusScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 2001
- Need for Revisiting the Concept of Reference Valuescclm, 2000
- Preanalytical and analytical factors affecting laboratory resultsAnnals of Medicine, 1998
- Diagnostic validity as a theoretical concept and as a measurable quantityClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 1997
- Analytical goals for the acceptance of common reference intervals for laboratories throughout a geographical areaScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1988