Evaluation of meningococcal meningitis vaccination strategies for the meningitis belt in Africa
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
- Vol. 18 (12) , 1051-1059
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199912000-00005
Abstract
Although the meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine has contributed to the control of Group A meningitis in the "meningitis belt" of Africa, recurrent large outbreaks have led to questions regarding vaccination strategy. We evaluated current and hypothetical vaccination strategies for the region. A model was formulated to analyze the effectiveness and costs of vaccine campaigns in response to outbreaks based on 7 years of weekly incidence data from Burkina Faso. Additional models analyzed the potential impact and costs of either a 1- or 4-dose routine scheduled delivery of meningococcal polysaccharide vaccine based on data reported to the World Health Organization from 16 countries during 1948 through 1996. Vaccine efficacy, vaccination coverage and economic data from literature reviews provided model assumptions. For Burkina Faso neither 1- nor 4-dose vaccination schedules would prevent >30% of meningitis cases compared with the 42% prevented through an outbreak response program of vaccinating districts, which reach an incidence of 15 per 100 000 persons for 2 weeks. For the entire meningitis belt, routine coverage with the 1- or 4-dose schedule meningococcal vaccine would require 4.9 and 19.6 million doses annually, respectively, for an annual net cost of $4.4 to $12.3 million and prevent an average 10 300 to 12 600 cases (23 to 28%), assuming a long term vaccine efficacy of 50%. In addition an initial "catch-up" campaign costing up to $72 million to vaccinate the population from 1 to 30 years of age would be required before achieving that level of effectiveness. Given the relatively poor routine vaccination coverage in this region, current strategies of vaccination campaigns that achieve higher coverage would generally be more effective and less costly than the modeled routine scheduled programs, assuming that campaigns can be rapidly implemented. Until a better vaccine is available, countries in this region would be more efficient in improving the response times to outbreaks, perhaps through improved surveillance, and in bolstering existing vaccination infrastructures rather than embarking on strategies of questionable effectiveness.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- SPONTANEOUS PROLIFERATIVE RESPONSE OF PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELLS IN VITRO AS AN INDICATOR OF HIGH RESPONSE TO HUMAN T-LYMPHOTROPIC VIRUS TYPE 1 INFECTION IN AN INFANT WITH INTERSTITIAL PNEUMONIAThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1998
- Meningococcal meningitis among Rwandan refugees: Diagnosis, management, and outcome in a field hospitalInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1998
- “Love's labours lost”: failure to implement mass vaccination against group A meningococcal meningitis in sub-Saharan AfricaThe Lancet, 1997
- Impact of a mass vaccination campaign against a meningitis epidemic in a refugee campTropical Medicine & International Health, 1996
- The 1990 meningococcal meningitis epidemic of Sarh (Chad): how useful was an earlier mass vaccination?Acta Tropica, 1995
- Detection of Meningitis Epidemics in Africa: A Population-Based AnalysisInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- AGE-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN DURATION OF CLINICAL PROTECTION AFTER VACCINATION WITH MENINGOCOCCAL POLYSACCHARIDE A VACCINEThe Lancet, 1985
- MENINGOCOCCAL DISEASE AND SEASON IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAThe Lancet, 1984
- Clinical Efficacy of Meningococcus Group A Capsular Polysaccharide Vaccine in Children Three Months to Five Years of AgeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- HUMAN IMMUNITY TO THE MENINGOCOCCUSThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1969