Evidence-Based Librarianship
- 1 September 2000
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Medical Reference Services Quarterly
- Vol. 19 (3) , 1-18
- https://doi.org/10.1300/j115v19n03_01
Abstract
This paper discusses the challenges of finding evidence needed to implement Evidence-Based Librarianship (EBL). Focusing first on database coverage for three health sciences librarianship journals, the article examines the information contents of different databases. Strategies are needed to search for relevant evidence in the library literature via these databases, and the problems associated with searching the grey literature of librarianship. Database coverage, plausible search strategies, and the grey literature of library science all pose challenges to finding the needed research evidence for practicing EBL. Health sciences librarians need to ensure that systems are designed that can track and provide access to needed research evidence to support Evidence-Based Librarianship (EBL).Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Teaching Lifelong Learning Skills in a Fourth-Year Medical CurriculumMedical Reference Services Quarterly, 1999
- Teaching and exposing grey literature: what the information profession needs to know ‐ examples from the sciencesCollection Building, 1998
- Instruction of Evidence-Based Medicine Searching Skills During First-Year EpidemiologyMedical Reference Services Quarterly, 1998
- Race, Poverty and the LawLegal Reference Services Quarterly, 1997
- Evidence-Based MedicineMedical Reference Services Quarterly, 1996
- Libraries and the R&D strategy: a way forwardHealth Libraries Review, 1996
- Publication pattern of papers presented at the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Annual MeetingThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 1996
- The Publication Outcome for the Papers Presented at the 1990 ABA ConferenceJournal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 1996
- Evidence-based practice: the role of the NHS Centre for Reviews and DisseminationHealth Libraries Review, 1994
- Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysisJAMA, 1994