Prognostic factors for virological response in antiretroviral therapy-naive patients in the MONARK Trial randomized to ritonavir-boosted lopinavir alone
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Antiviral Therapy
- Vol. 14 (1) , 93-97
- https://doi.org/10.1177/135965350901400105
Abstract
Background: MONARK is a pilot randomized trial comparing the safety and efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy to a standard triple-drug regimen as initial therapy. The primary endpoint was virological response (VR) defined as viral load (VL)<400 copies/ml at week 24 and VL<50 copies/ml at week 48. The objective of this study was to determine prognostic factors of VR in patients receiving LPV/r monotherapy. Methods: Baseline characteristics, including demographics, HIV type-1 (HIV-1) subtype (B versus non-B), early VR up to week 4, LPV trough concentrations and compliance were investigated as prognostic factors for VR in patients receiving LPV/r monotherapy. Logistic regression was used to search for variables significantly associated with the occurrence of VR. Results: VR was achieved in 53 out of 83 patients randomized to the LPV/r arm. The on-treatment analysis, using a multivariate model, indicated that having VL<400 copies/ml at week 4 and harbouring HIV-1 subtype B were independently associated with an increased probability of VR. No difference in early VL reduction was evidenced between patients harbouring B or non-B subtypes. The latter patients had more difficulty in adherence to therapy than the former patients. The intention-to-treat analysis showed similar results. Conclusions: HIV-1 RNA measured at baseline or at week 4 and HIV-1 subtype (B versus non-B) were independent predictive factors of VR in patients starting therapy with LPV/r alone. Although based on a small sample size, results of this study showed that adherence to therapy is lower in patients harbouring non-B subtypes and appears to be a key factor of VR in the context of protease inhibitor monotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy or plus zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patientsAIDS, 2008
- HIV-Infected Patients Receiving Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Achieve High Rates of Virologic Suppression Despite Adherence Rates Less Than 95%JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2007
- Regimen Simplification to Atazanavir-Ritonavir Alone as Maintenance Antiretroviral Therapy After Sustained Virologic SuppressionJAMA, 2006
- Week-12 Response to Therapy as a Predictor of Week 24, 48, and 96 Outcome in Patients Receiving the HIV Fusion Inhibitor Enfuvirtide in the T-20 versus Optimized Regimen Only (TORO) TrialsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Relationship between Adherence and the Development of Resistance in Antiretroviral‐Naive, HIV‐1–Infected Patients Receiving Lopinavir/Ritonavir or NelfinavirThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Long-term safety and durable antiretroviral activity of lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive patientsAIDS, 2004
- Lopinavir–Ritonavir versus Nelfinavir for the Initial Treatment of HIV InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A Randomized Trial of Three Maintenance Regimens Given after Three Months of Induction Therapy with Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and Indinavir in Previously Untreated HIV-1–Infected PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Maintenance Antiretroviral Therapies in HIV-Infected Subjects with Undetectable Plasma HIV RNA after Triple-Drug TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Adverse effects of reverse transcriptase inhibitorsAIDS, 1998