Comparison of metal Versus Vialon® subcutaneous catheters in a palliative care setting
- 1 October 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Palliative Medicine
- Vol. 8 (4) , 333-336
- https://doi.org/10.1177/026921639400800410
Abstract
In 63 evaluable palliative care patients requiring intermittent bolus subcutaneous administration of medication, who were randomly assigned either a standard metal subcutaneous needle or a PTFE (Vialon®) catheter, there was a significantly greater incidence of local reactions at the insertion site with the metal needles (9/30) compared with the PTFE catheters (2/33). Despite this, there was no significant difference between the two in functional survival. Volume of medication injected per day was the best predictor of total time that the subcutaneous lines remained in situ.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- A prospective comparison study between a butterfly needle and a Teflon cannula for subcutaneous narcotic administrationJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1994
- Insulin injection technique.BMJ, 1990
- Comparison of Teflon cannulas and metal needles for subcutaneous infusion in terminal care: a pilot study.BMJ, 1990
- Subcutaneous infusions for control of cancer symptomsJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1990
- HISTOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG INFUSION SITES IN PATIENTS DYING OF CANCERThe Lancet, 1988
- Syringe drivers in palliative care: a reviewPalliative Medicine, 1988