Excess Dosing of Antiplatelet and Antithrombin Agents in the Treatment of Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 28 December 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 294 (24) , 3108-3116
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.24.3108
Abstract
Current quality improvement efforts in acute cardiovascular care are focused on closing treatment gaps so more eligible patients receive evidence-based therapies.1,2 Beyond ensuring that effective therapies are administered, attention should also be directed at ensuring these therapies are given both correctly and safely. In acute coronary syndromes (ACS), early use of antiplatelet and antithrombin therapy plays a key role in altering the thrombotic process resulting from plaque rupture, thereby improving patient outcomes.1,3-10 Numerous studies have also helped define dosing strategies for antithrombotic therapy; these individualized dosing strategies based on weight and renal function minimize bleeding risk while preserving therapeutic benefits.11-19 Despite these guidelines, bleeding complications remain a major concern in patients with non–ST-segment elevation (NSTE) ACS and occur in approximately 3% to 9% of selected clinical trial populations; even higher rates have been reported in the community.9,10,20,21 Antithrombotic agents have narrow therapeutic windows, which makes dosing an important concern. In addition, patient factors have been associated with greater risk of bleeding. However, the variation and impact of antithrombotic dosing on the safety of evidence-based medicine has yet to be carefully studied outside of the standardized clinical trial environment, or after adjusting for patient factors.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of eptifibatide in subjects with normal or impaired renal functionClinical Therapeutics, 2004
- Predictors of major bleeding in acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)European Heart Journal, 2003
- Enoxaparin in unstable angina patients who would have been excluded from randomized pivotal trialsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Heparin dosing and outcome in acute coronary syndromes: The GUSTO-IIb experienceAmerican Heart Journal, 2002
- Influence of patient characteristics and renal function on factor Xa inhibition pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics after enoxaparin administration in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromesAmerican Heart Journal, 2002
- Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2002
- Effects of Clopidogrel in Addition to Aspirin in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes without ST-Segment ElevationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: a meta-analysisThe Lancet, 2000
- Use and Effectiveness of Intravenous Heparin Therapy for Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction in the ElderlyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Unstable Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997