Hegemony, consensus and Trilateralism
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Review of International Studies
- Vol. 12 (3) , 205-222
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500113932
Abstract
This essay attempts to apply concepts of hegemony to the case of contemporary North American—Western European—Japanese (‘Trilateral’) relations and, more specifically, to analyse the role and importance of a unique international organization the Trilateral Commission (TC), within Trilateral relations. The essay comprises: (i) a comparison of the Realist and Gramscian concepts of hegemony and relates them to aspects of the post-war international order; (ii) a more extended discussion of the Gramscian concept of hegemony and related concepts; (iii) an exposition of aspects of the ‘Trilateral’ approach, a discussion of the TC and an interpretation of the TC using Gramscian analysis; and (iv) a discussion of the long-term structural pressures on the Trilateral relationship in the context of a reconstituted hegemony.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The mysterious case of vanishing hegemony; or, Is Mark Twain really dead?International Organization, 1985
- In Search of ‘International Political Economy’Political Studies, 1984
- Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in MethodMillennium: Journal of International Studies, 1983
- A Crisis of HegemonyPublished by Springer Nature ,1982
- International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic orderInternational Organization, 1982
- International political economy: perspectives and prospects—Part IIReview of International Studies, 1982
- The newest mercantilismInternational Organization, 1981
- The Global Dominance SystemJournal of Peace Research, 1973
- The economics of interdependenceThe International Executive, 1968