Three‐dimensional (3D) echocardiographic analysis of congenital heart disease in the fetus: comparison with cross‐sectional (2D) fetal echocardiography
Open Access
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 17 (6) , 485-492
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00429.x
Abstract
Objective: We attempted to assess the ability of Doppler‐gated three‐dimensional (3D) fetal echocardiography to reconstruct and display specific cardiac structures in fetuses with cardiac anomalies and to determine whether any advantage is offered by 3D sonographic cardiac examination over conventional fetal echocardiography.Design: After 2D fetal echocardiographic examination, 3D cardiac data were collected prospectively in 22 fetuses with various congenital heart defects. Their ages ranged from 19 to 35 weeks' gestation. Basic echocardiographic key views of the venoatrial, atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial connections were derived from volume data sets and selected for 3D reconstruction and analysis. Comparisons were made with 2D echocardiographic imaging of the fetal hearts and the diagnostic image quality of visualized structural details was evaluated.Results: The underlying cardiac malformation was well or satisfactorily visualized in 20 fetuses using 2D imaging. Gated 3D volume data sets enabled diagnostically acceptable visualization of all affected cardiac structures in 7 of 22 fetuses. High‐quality 3D reconstruction of the site and spatial orientation of ventricular septal defects was obtained in 9 of 13 patients. Two‐dimensional imaging remained the principal diagnostic modality in all cases with additional structural detail being obtained by 3D imaging in only two fetuses.Conclusions: Three‐dimensional imaging of fetal heart disease is feasible for a wide range of lesions, and may provide additional information of clinical value in a small number of cases when compared with 2D imaging. Copyright © 2001 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologyKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sources and impact of artifacts on clinical three‐dimensional ultrasound imagingUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Three‐dimensional (3‐D) ultrasonography for obtaining the four and five‐chamber view: comparison with cross‐sectional (2‐D) fetal sonographic screeningUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Efficacy of fetal echocardiography and yield by risk categoryPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1999
- Transthoracic 3-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of subaortic stenosis due to a restrictive ventricular septal defect in double inlet left ventricle with discordant ventriculoarterial connectionsCardiology in the Young, 1999
- Three Dimensional ultrasound ‐ a requirement for prenatal diagnosis?Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Evaluation of three‐dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of congenital heart anomalies in fetal cardiac specimensUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Advances in cardiac imaging in congenital heart diseaseCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics, 1995
- The accuracy of antenatal fetal echocardiography screening in high- and low-risk patientsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography with a computed tomography imaging probe: initial clinical experience with transthoracic application in infants and children with congenital heart defects.Heart, 1994
- Simulation of intraoperative visualization of cardiac structures and study of dynamic surgical anatomy with real-time three-dimensional echocardiographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994