A Structural Contingency Approach to Bureaucracy and Democracy in U.S. National Unions
- 1 August 1997
- journal article
- Published by Academy of Management in The Academy of Management Journal
- Vol. 40 (4) , 831-861
- https://doi.org/10.5465/256950
Abstract
Drawing on industrial relations and organizational science concepts, in this article we apply elements of contingency theory to national unions' representative and administrative structures. We argue that these structures are distinct and develop in response to different organizational and environmental imperatives. These ideas were tested with a unique set of data on unions' characteristics and environments. The results provide broad support for our approach and suggest that greater collaboration among industrial relations and organizational science scholars would benefit both literatures.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Centralization of Bargaining Decisions in American UnionsIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1993
- Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence modelStrategic Management Journal, 1990
- The Effects of Union Organizational and Environmental Characteristics on Union Political ActionAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1988
- Measuring Organizational Control: The Reliability and Validity of the Control Graph ApproachHuman Relations, 1984
- Dimensions of Organizational Task EnvironmentsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1984
- Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982
- Relationships Between Organizational Structure and Employee Reactions: Comparing Alternative FrameworksAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1981
- The Process of Horizontal Differentiation: Two ModelsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980
- Organizational Size and the Structuralist Perspective: A Review, Critique, and ProposalAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1976
- Relationships among components of credibility and communication behaviors in work units.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976