The pseudogap: friend or foe of highTc?

Top Cited Papers
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Although nineteen years have passed since the discovery of high temperature cuprate superconductivity 1 Bednorz, JG and Müller, KA . 1986. Z. Phys. B, 64: 189 [Crossref] [Google Scholar] , there is still no consensus on its physical origin. This is in large part because of a lack of understanding of the state of matter out of which the superconductivity arises. In optimally and underdoped materials, this state exhibits a pseudogap at temperatures large compared to the superconducting transition temperature 2 Warren, WW Jr., Walstedt, RE , Brennert, GF , Cava, RJ , Tycko, R , Bell, R and Dabbagh, G . 1989. Phys. Rev. Lett., 62: 1193 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] , 3 Alloul, H , Ohno, T and Mendels, P . 1989. Phys. Rev. Lett., 63: 1700 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] . Although discovered only three years after the pioneering work of Bednorz and Müller, the physical origin of this pseudogap behavior and whether it constitutes a distinct phase of matter is still shrouded in mystery. In the summer of 2004, a band of physicists gathered for five weeks at the Aspen Center for Physics to discuss the pseudogap. In this perspective, we would like to summarize some of the results presented there and discuss the importance of the pseudogap phase in the context of strongly correlated electron systems.