Clinical comparison of the BACTEC 9000 Standard Anaerobic/F and Lytic/F blood culture media
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
- Vol. 24 (4) , 191-196
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(96)00060-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anaerobic blood cultures: Tailoring their selective useClinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1995
- Selection of a clinically satisfactory blood culture system: The utility of anaerobic mediaClinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1995
- Bloodstream Infections at a Norwegian University Hospital, 1974-1979 and 1988-1989: Changing Etiology, Clinical Features, and OutcomeClinical Infectious Diseases, 1994
- Clinical assessment of anaerobic isolates from blood culturesDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1993
- Routine anaerobic blood cultures: Reasons for continued useClinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1992
- Anaerobic bacteremia: Incidence, patient characteristics, and clinical significanceThe American Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Routine anaerobic blood cultures: Still appropriate today?Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 1991
- Anaerobic Bacteremia: Decreasing Rate Over a 15-Year PeriodClinical Infectious Diseases, 1991
- Multicenter comparison of the high volume (10 ml) NR bactec plus system and the standard (5 ml) NR bactec systemDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 1991
- Clinical implications of positive blood culturesClinical Microbiology Reviews, 1989