A Factor Analysis of Contraceptive Preferences
- 2 July 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 84 (2) , 199-210
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1973.9923830
Abstract
Factor analysis of acceptability ratings given to 10 contraceptive methods by 178 Ss (78 male, 100 female) identified four groupings: (a) coitusdependent—condom, diaphragm, and foam or jelly; (b) surgical—vasectomy and tubal ligation; (c) coitus-inhibiting—abstinence, rhythm, and withdrawal; and (d) coitus-independent—intrauterine device and pill. Factor scores were computed and correlated with variables from the Adjective Check List, California F Scale, California Psychological Inventory, College Vocabulary Test, Miller-Fisk Sexual Knowledge Questionnaire, and Rotter's locus-of-control scale. Although the yield of significant correlations was modest, several heuristic patterns of covariation with the personality and cognitive measures were noted.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vasectomy and Adverse Psychological ReactionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1970
- Prostaglandins in reproductive physiologyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1970
- Letters to the EditorScience, 1969
- Psychological Aspects of Oral ContraceptivesArchives of General Psychiatry, 1968
- IDENTIFICATION OF PROSTAGLANDINS IN HUMAN AMNIOTIC FLUIDBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1966
- Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1966
- The incidence of operations that prevent conceptionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1964
- On the specific vaso‐dilating and plain muscle stimulating substances from accessory genital glands in man and certain animals (prostaglandin and vesiglandin)The Journal of Physiology, 1936
- PROCEEDINGS OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL SOCIETYThe Journal of Physiology, 1935