Visual and auditory performance variations with age: Some implications
- 1 December 1967
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Australian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 193-201
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00049536708255578
Abstract
The ability to see visual detail in objects moving at angular velocities ranging from 20° to 150° per second was examined in 492 male and female Ss, age range 20 to 80 years. Dynamic visual acuity declined with age, and was generally poorer in females than in males. Sex differences in visual and auditory acuity are ascribed to influences of training and experience. Some implications are made concerning the effects of peripheral variables upon performance in psychological tests. Groups differing in dynamic visual acuity obtain different scores in tests such as Raven's Matrices but show little difference in verbal tests. It is suggested that some of the decline in ability which occurs with age in certain tests may be due to changes in efficiency of the visual processes.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Data‐processing levels and thought disorder in schizophreniaAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1966
- Relationship between static and dynamic visual acuity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965
- Factors Influencing Auditory Perception of Pure Tones and SpeechJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1962
- Prediction of Speech Hearing Loss for Older Industrial WorkersGerontology, 1961
- The concept of statistical significance and the controversy about one-tailed tests.Psychological Review, 1960
- Age Differences in the Ability to Use Visual Cues in Auditory CommunicationLanguage and Speech, 1959
- THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN INDEX OF INTELLIGENCEBritish Journal of Psychology, 1955
- VISUAL ACUITY WHILE ONE IS VIEWING A MOVING OBJECTArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1949
- Language Patterns of Pre-School ChildrenThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1932
- Nature of mirror-drawing ability: norms on mirror-drawing for white children by age and sex.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1930