The Limits of Over-constancy
Open Access
- 1 September 1965
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 17 (3) , 209-216
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216508416434
Abstract
A number of studies have led to the generalization that there is a tendency to “overconstancy” in the perception of size. The experiments reported here suggest that over-estimation is limited to objects subtending angles of approximately 2° or less, and that objects subtending greater angles are judged fairly accurately. This raises the possibility that foveal diameter (approximately 2°) is involved.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Size-constancy judgments and perceptual compromise.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962
- The current status of the size-distance hypotheses.Psychological Bulletin, 1961
- Overestimation in Size-Constancy JudgmentsThe American Journal of Psychology, 1960
- A Relationship between Increments of Distance and Estimates of Objective SizeThe American Journal of Psychology, 1959
- Visual Sensory Units and the Minimal Angle of Resolution*American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1958
- Effects of varied distance on short-range size judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1957
- The Effect of Attitude upon the Perception of SizeThe American Journal of Psychology, 1955
- A Methodological Study of Size-Distance PerceptionThe Journal of Psychology, 1953
- Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance VariantThe American Journal of Psychology, 1941