Aprepitant as salvage antiemetic therapy in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide
- 6 December 2008
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Supportive Care in Cancer
- Vol. 17 (8) , 1065-1070
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-008-0545-7
Abstract
To assess the efficacy of adding aprepitant to a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone as salvage antiemetic therapy for breast cancer patients receiving their initial cycle of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) and failing to achieve complete control of emesis. Eligibility: breast cancer patients receiving their first cycle of AC. Treatment: standard dose of a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone 8–10 mg IV/PO on day 1 prior to cycle 1 of AC and dexamethasone 4 mg bid on days 2 and 3. Patients without complete control (no emesis, no nausea, or rescue antiemetics) during cycle 1 could proceed to cycle 2. During cycle 2, patients received AC and identical antiemetics (except dexamethasone 4 mg qd on days 2 and 3) plus aprepitant 125 mg PO day 1 and 80 mg PO days 2 and 3. Primary endpoint: complete control, 0–120 h after chemotherapy. Sixty-two patients received cycle 1 of AC. Complete control cycle 1: 13 patients (21%; 95%CI, 12–33%). Of the 49 patients eligible for cycle 2, four elected not to continue on study. Of the 45 patients receiving cycle 2, 44 were evaluable. Complete control and complete response (no emesis, no rescue) for the 5-day study period improved from 0% to 18% (p = 0.14) and 7% to 36% (p = 0.02) on cycles 1 and 2, respectively. In breast cancer patients receiving AC, the addition of aprepitant to a 5-HT3 antagonist and dexamethasone during cycle 2 of treatment improved antiemetic outcome. Although the improvement in the primary endpoint of complete control during cycle 2 was not significant, all secondary endpoints such as complete response and no emesis rates were significantly better during cycle 2. The extent of antiemetic control during cycle 2 was numerically inferior to the results achieved in a phase III trial employing aprepitant with cycle 1 of AC chemotherapy, suggesting that the preferred approach is to include aprepitant with the initial cycle of AC chemotherapy.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and VomitingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO Clinical Recommendations for prophylaxisAnnals of Oncology, 2007
- Aprepitant as Salvage Therapy in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Emesis Refractory to Prophylaxis with 5-HT3 Antagonists and DexamethasoneOncology Research and Treatment, 2006
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline for Antiemetics in Oncology: Update 2006Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced emesis: results of the 2004 Perugia International Antiemetic Consensus ConferenceAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients With Breast Cancer After Moderately Emetogenic ChemotherapyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Antiemetic prescription in Italian breast cancer patients submitted to adjuvant chemotherapySupportive Care in Cancer, 2003
- The Oral Neurokinin-1 Antagonist Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Patients Receiving High-Dose Cisplatin—The Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Nausea and emesis remain significant problems of chemotherapy despite prophylaxis with 5‐hydroxytryptamine‐3 antiemeticsCancer, 2003
- Course, patterns, and risk-factors for chemotherapy-induced emesis in cisplatin-pretreated patients: a study with ondansetronEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992