Driving Restrictions Advised by Midwestern Cardiologists Implanting Cardioverter Defibrillators: Present Practices, Criteria Utilized, and Compatibility with Existing State Laws
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 15 (8) , 1131-1136
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03115.x
Abstract
Although some patients remain at risk of losing physical control or collapsing after implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator for sustained ventricular arrhythmias, little is known about restrictions advised by arrhythmia specialists to patients with implanted devices concerning physical activities such as driving. In this study, all of the 58 cardiologists implanting cardioverter defibrillators in three contiguous midwestern states were surveyed to determine present practices and the compatibility of these practices with existing state law. Of the 51 respondents (88%), 27 cardiologists (53%) advised only those implanted patients who had had arrhythmia-induced presyncope or physical collapse to cease driving. Twenty two of the remaining cardiologists (43%) advised all implanted patients to cease driving, whereas two cardiologists (4%) never advised any implanted patient to restrict driving. Permanent driving abstinence was advised by seven of the responding cardiologists (14%), while temporary driving abstinence for periods of 2-12 months (mean 6 +/- 3 months) was recommended by the remaining 42 respondents (82%) who advised against driving. The criteria utilized, driving restrictions advised, and durations advised for driving restrictions were not uniform in any of the 13 surveyed university and nonaffiliated cardiology practices with greater than or equal to 2 implanting cardiologists. Overall, 38 cardiologists (74%) advised against driving and recommended durations that equaled or exceed their state's minimum legal requirements, although only 27 of the 51 cardiologists (53%) based their practice upon knowledge of their state's driving laws. The results of this survey suggest that the majority of cardiologists who implant cardioverter defibrillators advise their patients against driving postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- When Should Patients with Lethal Ventricular Arrhythmia Resume Driving?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Cardiovascular Practice: Report of the Policy Conference of the North American Society of Pacing and ElectrophysiologyPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1991
- Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Is early implantation cost-effective?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1990
- Provocation of ventricular tachycardia by an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillatorAmerican Heart Journal, 1990
- The Use of Beep‐O‐Grams in the Assessment of Automatic Implantahle Cardioverter Defibrillator Sensing FunctionPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- The automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Efficacy, complications and survival in patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmiasJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Clinical experience, complications, and follow-up in 25 patientsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1988
- Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Patient survival, battery longevity and shock delivery analysisJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- The Automatic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: Efficacy, Complications, and Device FailuresAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Termination of Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias with an Implanted Automatic Defibrillator in Human BeingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980