Should the cytologic diagnosis of “atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance” be qualified?
- 12 April 2001
- Vol. 93 (2) , 93-99
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.9013
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Increased Detection of Epithelial Cell Abnormalities by Liquid-Based Gynecologic Cytology PreparationsActa Cytologica, 1998
- ASCUS and AGUS CriteriaActa Cytologica, 1998
- Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Correlative histologic and follow-up studies from an academic medical centerDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1997
- Reporting of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: Is it significant?Diagnostic Cytopathology, 1995
- Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: Interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitorsDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1994
- Reactive change and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in papanicolaou smears: A cytohistologic correlationDiagnostic Cytopathology, 1993
- The 1988 Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical/Vaginal Cytological DiagnosesJAMA, 1989
- Evaluation of the atypical Pap smearAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Atypia in cervical cytology as a risk factor for intraepithelial neoplasiaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Should patients with mild atypia in a cervical smear be referred for colposcopy?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986