Underpowering in randomized trials reporting a sample size calculation
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 56 (8) , 717-720
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00141-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Type-II Error Rates (Beta Errors) of Randomized Trials in Orthopaedic TraumaJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2001
- Randomised trial of acupuncture compared with conventional massage and "sham" laser acupuncture for treatment of chronic neck pain Commentary: Controls for acupuncture---can we finally see theBMJ, 2001
- The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and ElaborationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Compliance, satisfaction, and quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer receiving home chemotherapy or outpatient treatment: a randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2001
- Have Randomized Controlled Trials of Neuroprotective Drugs Been Underpowered?Stroke, 2001
- Randomised controlled trial of non-directive counselling, cognitive-behaviour therapy, and usual general practitioner care for patients with depression. I: Clinical effectivenessBMJ, 2000
- Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomesBMJ, 1998
- The power of tests to detect differences between periodontal treatments in published studiesJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 1992
- Beta, or type II error in psychiatric controlled clinical trialsJournal of Psychiatric Research, 1985
- The Importance of Beta, the Type II Error and Sample Size in the Design and Interpretation of the Randomized Control TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978