THE CRISIS OF THE MOVEMENTS: THE ENABLING STATE AS QUISLING

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The basic argument of this paper is that the anti‐systemic movements political successes over the last century have turned out to be medium‐term cul de sacs at the expense of the real longue duree purposes of the movements. The discovery of the enabling state by radicals towards the end of the nineteenth century has resulted in a Quisling in the anti‐systemic ranks. This argument brings to the fore the anarchist critique which never accepted the enabling state as a legitimate part of the radical political repertoire. Nevertheless this essay is not a plea for a return to anarchist roots but rather attempts to reinsert anarchism, and feminism, into a single framework of anti‐systemic movements alongside socialism and nationalism. As the state is being shown to be disenabling rather than enabling across the various zones of the world‐economy it is argued that anarchist ideas deserve some priority as we revise radical political strategies.

This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit: